Leeds Wins
6
of 6 categories
Tied
0
categories
San Francisco Wins
0
of 6 categories
Category Breakdown
Compare costs across 6 key categories
Overall Cost
69
Leeds
vs
105
San Francisco
Leeds is 36 pts cheaper
Rent
48
Leeds
vs
110
San Francisco
Leeds is 62 pts cheaper
Groceries
93
Leeds
vs
102
San Francisco
Leeds is 9 pts cheaper
Restaurants
76
Leeds
vs
105
San Francisco
Leeds is 29 pts cheaper
Transport
82
Leeds
vs
95
San Francisco
Leeds is 13 pts cheaper
Utilities
88
Leeds
vs
98
San Francisco
Leeds is 10 pts cheaper
Salary Equivalence
How much you'd need in San Francisco to match a Leeds salary
| Salary in Leeds | Equivalent in San Francisco | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $76,087 | $26,087 more |
| $75,000 | $114,130 | $39,130 more |
| $100,000 | $152,174 | $52,174 more |
| $125,000 | $190,217 | $65,217 more |
| $150,000 | $228,261 | $78,261 more |
| $200,000 | $304,348 | $104,348 more |
Leeds vs San Francisco: Summary
The overall cost of living differs by 36%. Leeds is the more affordable option.
Rent: Leeds has a rent index of 48, while San Francisco has 110.
Average Salaries: Leeds: $2,450/month vs San Francisco: $7,000/month (both in USD).
Out of 6 categories, Leeds wins 6, while San Francisco wins 0.
Compare more cities or calculate your US take-home pay.