Glasgow Wins
6
of 6 categories
Tied
0
categories
San Francisco Wins
0
of 6 categories
Category Breakdown
Compare costs across 6 key categories
Overall Cost
68
Glasgow
vs
105
San Francisco
Glasgow is 37 pts cheaper
Rent
48
Glasgow
vs
110
San Francisco
Glasgow is 62 pts cheaper
Groceries
93
Glasgow
vs
102
San Francisco
Glasgow is 9 pts cheaper
Restaurants
75
Glasgow
vs
105
San Francisco
Glasgow is 30 pts cheaper
Transport
80
Glasgow
vs
95
San Francisco
Glasgow is 15 pts cheaper
Utilities
88
Glasgow
vs
98
San Francisco
Glasgow is 10 pts cheaper
Salary Equivalence
How much you'd need in San Francisco to match a Glasgow salary
| Salary in Glasgow | Equivalent in San Francisco | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $77,206 | $27,206 more |
| $75,000 | $115,809 | $40,809 more |
| $100,000 | $154,412 | $54,412 more |
| $125,000 | $193,015 | $68,015 more |
| $150,000 | $231,618 | $81,618 more |
| $200,000 | $308,824 | $108,824 more |
Glasgow vs San Francisco: Summary
The overall cost of living differs by 37%. Glasgow is the more affordable option.
Rent: Glasgow has a rent index of 48, while San Francisco has 110.
Average Salaries: Glasgow: $2,500/month vs San Francisco: $7,000/month (both in USD).
Out of 6 categories, Glasgow wins 6, while San Francisco wins 0.
Compare more cities or calculate your US take-home pay.