Liverpool Wins
6
of 6 categories
Tied
0
categories
San Francisco Wins
0
of 6 categories
Category Breakdown
Compare costs across 6 key categories
Overall Cost
66
Liverpool
vs
105
San Francisco
Liverpool is 39 pts cheaper
Rent
42
Liverpool
vs
110
San Francisco
Liverpool is 68 pts cheaper
Groceries
92
Liverpool
vs
102
San Francisco
Liverpool is 10 pts cheaper
Restaurants
74
Liverpool
vs
105
San Francisco
Liverpool is 31 pts cheaper
Transport
80
Liverpool
vs
95
San Francisco
Liverpool is 15 pts cheaper
Utilities
86
Liverpool
vs
98
San Francisco
Liverpool is 12 pts cheaper
Salary Equivalence
How much you'd need in San Francisco to match a Liverpool salary
| Salary in Liverpool | Equivalent in San Francisco | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $79,545 | $29,545 more |
| $75,000 | $119,318 | $44,318 more |
| $100,000 | $159,091 | $59,091 more |
| $125,000 | $198,864 | $73,864 more |
| $150,000 | $238,636 | $88,636 more |
| $200,000 | $318,182 | $118,182 more |
Liverpool vs San Francisco: Summary
The overall cost of living differs by 39%. Liverpool is the more affordable option.
Rent: Liverpool has a rent index of 42, while San Francisco has 110.
Average Salaries: Liverpool: $2,300/month vs San Francisco: $7,000/month (both in USD).
Out of 6 categories, Liverpool wins 6, while San Francisco wins 0.
Compare more cities or calculate your US take-home pay.