Bristol Wins
6
of 6 categories
Tied
0
categories
San Francisco Wins
0
of 6 categories
Category Breakdown
Compare costs across 6 key categories
Overall Cost
76
Bristol
vs
105
San Francisco
Bristol is 29 pts cheaper
Rent
62
Bristol
vs
110
San Francisco
Bristol is 48 pts cheaper
Groceries
97
Bristol
vs
102
San Francisco
Bristol is 5 pts cheaper
Restaurants
82
Bristol
vs
105
San Francisco
Bristol is 23 pts cheaper
Transport
85
Bristol
vs
95
San Francisco
Bristol is 10 pts cheaper
Utilities
90
Bristol
vs
98
San Francisco
Bristol is 8 pts cheaper
Salary Equivalence
How much you'd need in San Francisco to match a Bristol salary
| Salary in Bristol | Equivalent in San Francisco | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $69,079 | $19,079 more |
| $75,000 | $103,618 | $28,618 more |
| $100,000 | $138,158 | $38,158 more |
| $125,000 | $172,697 | $47,697 more |
| $150,000 | $207,237 | $57,237 more |
| $200,000 | $276,316 | $76,316 more |
Bristol vs San Francisco: Summary
The overall cost of living differs by 29%. Bristol is the more affordable option.
Rent: Bristol has a rent index of 62, while San Francisco has 110.
Average Salaries: Bristol: $2,700/month vs San Francisco: $7,000/month (both in USD).
Out of 6 categories, Bristol wins 6, while San Francisco wins 0.
Compare more cities or calculate your US take-home pay.