Brisbane Wins
6
of 6 categories
Tied
0
categories
San Francisco Wins
0
of 6 categories
Category Breakdown
Compare costs across 6 key categories
Overall Cost
82
Brisbane
vs
105
San Francisco
Brisbane is 23 pts cheaper
Rent
78
Brisbane
vs
110
San Francisco
Brisbane is 32 pts cheaper
Groceries
88
Brisbane
vs
102
San Francisco
Brisbane is 14 pts cheaper
Restaurants
82
Brisbane
vs
105
San Francisco
Brisbane is 23 pts cheaper
Transport
80
Brisbane
vs
95
San Francisco
Brisbane is 15 pts cheaper
Utilities
90
Brisbane
vs
98
San Francisco
Brisbane is 8 pts cheaper
Salary Equivalence
How much you'd need in San Francisco to match a Brisbane salary
| Salary in Brisbane | Equivalent in San Francisco | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $64,024 | $14,024 more |
| $75,000 | $96,037 | $21,037 more |
| $100,000 | $128,049 | $28,049 more |
| $125,000 | $160,061 | $35,061 more |
| $150,000 | $192,073 | $42,073 more |
| $200,000 | $256,098 | $56,098 more |
Brisbane vs San Francisco: Summary
The overall cost of living differs by 23%. Brisbane is the more affordable option.
Rent: Brisbane has a rent index of 78, while San Francisco has 110.
Average Salaries: Brisbane: $2,860/month vs San Francisco: $7,000/month (both in USD).
Out of 6 categories, Brisbane wins 6, while San Francisco wins 0.
Compare more cities or calculate your US take-home pay.