Belfast Wins
6
of 6 categories
Tied
0
categories
San Francisco Wins
0
of 6 categories
Category Breakdown
Compare costs across 6 key categories
Overall Cost
64
Belfast
vs
105
San Francisco
Belfast is 41 pts cheaper
Rent
38
Belfast
vs
110
San Francisco
Belfast is 72 pts cheaper
Groceries
90
Belfast
vs
102
San Francisco
Belfast is 12 pts cheaper
Restaurants
70
Belfast
vs
105
San Francisco
Belfast is 35 pts cheaper
Transport
76
Belfast
vs
95
San Francisco
Belfast is 19 pts cheaper
Utilities
82
Belfast
vs
98
San Francisco
Belfast is 16 pts cheaper
Salary Equivalence
How much you'd need in San Francisco to match a Belfast salary
| Salary in Belfast | Equivalent in San Francisco | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $82,031 | $32,031 more |
| $75,000 | $123,047 | $48,047 more |
| $100,000 | $164,063 | $64,063 more |
| $125,000 | $205,078 | $80,078 more |
| $150,000 | $246,094 | $96,094 more |
| $200,000 | $328,125 | $128,125 more |
Belfast vs San Francisco: Summary
The overall cost of living differs by 41%. Belfast is the more affordable option.
Rent: Belfast has a rent index of 38, while San Francisco has 110.
Average Salaries: Belfast: $2,200/month vs San Francisco: $7,000/month (both in USD).
Out of 6 categories, Belfast wins 6, while San Francisco wins 0.
Compare more cities or calculate your US take-home pay.