Liverpool Wins
6
of 6 categories
Tied
0
categories
Los Angeles Wins
0
of 6 categories
Category Breakdown
Compare costs across 6 key categories
Overall Cost
66
Liverpool
vs
85
Los Angeles
Liverpool is 19 pts cheaper
Rent
42
Liverpool
vs
85
Los Angeles
Liverpool is 43 pts cheaper
Groceries
92
Liverpool
vs
95
Los Angeles
Liverpool is 3 pts cheaper
Restaurants
74
Liverpool
vs
90
Los Angeles
Liverpool is 16 pts cheaper
Transport
80
Liverpool
vs
105
Los Angeles
Liverpool is 25 pts cheaper
Utilities
86
Liverpool
vs
90
Los Angeles
Liverpool is 4 pts cheaper
Salary Equivalence
How much you'd need in Los Angeles to match a Liverpool salary
| Salary in Liverpool | Equivalent in Los Angeles | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $64,394 | $14,394 more |
| $75,000 | $96,591 | $21,591 more |
| $100,000 | $128,788 | $28,788 more |
| $125,000 | $160,985 | $35,985 more |
| $150,000 | $193,182 | $43,182 more |
| $200,000 | $257,576 | $57,576 more |
Liverpool vs Los Angeles: Summary
The overall cost of living differs by 19%. Liverpool is the more affordable option.
Rent: Liverpool has a rent index of 42, while Los Angeles has 85.
Average Salaries: Liverpool: $2,300/month vs Los Angeles: $4,800/month (both in USD).
Out of 6 categories, Liverpool wins 6, while Los Angeles wins 0.
Compare more cities or calculate your US take-home pay.