Liverpool Wins
5
of 6 categories
Tied
0
categories
Chicago Wins
1
of 6 categories
Category Breakdown
Compare costs across 6 key categories
Overall Cost
66
Liverpool
vs
68
Chicago
Liverpool is 2 pts cheaper
Rent
42
Liverpool
vs
55
Chicago
Liverpool is 13 pts cheaper
Groceries
92
Liverpool
vs
85
Chicago
Chicago is 7 pts cheaper
Restaurants
74
Liverpool
vs
80
Chicago
Liverpool is 6 pts cheaper
Transport
80
Liverpool
vs
90
Chicago
Liverpool is 10 pts cheaper
Utilities
86
Liverpool
vs
95
Chicago
Liverpool is 9 pts cheaper
Salary Equivalence
How much you'd need in Chicago to match a Liverpool salary
| Salary in Liverpool | Equivalent in Chicago | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,515 | $1,515 more |
| $75,000 | $77,273 | $2,273 more |
| $100,000 | $103,030 | $3,030 more |
| $125,000 | $128,788 | $3,788 more |
| $150,000 | $154,545 | $4,545 more |
| $200,000 | $206,061 | $6,061 more |
Liverpool vs Chicago: Summary
The overall cost of living differs by 2%. Liverpool is the more affordable option.
Rent: Liverpool has a rent index of 42, while Chicago has 55.
Average Salaries: Liverpool: $2,300/month vs Chicago: $4,200/month (both in USD).
Out of 6 categories, Liverpool wins 5, while Chicago wins 1.
Compare more cities or calculate your US take-home pay.