Brisbane Wins
5
of 6 categories
Tied
1
categories
Los Angeles Wins
0
of 6 categories
Category Breakdown
Compare costs across 6 key categories
Overall Cost
82
Brisbane
vs
85
Los Angeles
Brisbane is 3 pts cheaper
Rent
78
Brisbane
vs
85
Los Angeles
Brisbane is 7 pts cheaper
Groceries
88
Brisbane
vs
95
Los Angeles
Brisbane is 7 pts cheaper
Restaurants
82
Brisbane
vs
90
Los Angeles
Brisbane is 8 pts cheaper
Transport
80
Brisbane
vs
105
Los Angeles
Brisbane is 25 pts cheaper
Utilities
90
Brisbane
vs
90
Los Angeles
Same cost
Salary Equivalence
How much you'd need in Los Angeles to match a Brisbane salary
| Salary in Brisbane | Equivalent in Los Angeles | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,829 | $1,829 more |
| $75,000 | $77,744 | $2,744 more |
| $100,000 | $103,659 | $3,659 more |
| $125,000 | $129,573 | $4,573 more |
| $150,000 | $155,488 | $5,488 more |
| $200,000 | $207,317 | $7,317 more |
Brisbane vs Los Angeles: Summary
The overall cost of living differs by 3%. Brisbane is the more affordable option.
Rent: Brisbane has a rent index of 78, while Los Angeles has 85.
Average Salaries: Brisbane: $2,860/month vs Los Angeles: $4,800/month (both in USD).
Out of 6 categories, Brisbane wins 5, while Los Angeles wins 0.
Compare more cities or calculate your US take-home pay.